New Entity Classification Regulations
Jurisdiction | United States,Federal |
Citation | Vol. 26 No. 4 Pg. 3 |
Pages | 3 |
Publication year | 1997 |
1997, April, Pg. 3. New Entity Classification Regulations
Vol. 26, No. 4, Pg. 3
The Colorado Lawyer
April 1997
Vol. 26, No. 4 [Page 3]
April 1997
Vol. 26, No. 4 [Page 3]
Articles
New Entity Classification Regulations
New Entity Classification Regulations
by J. William Callison
New Entity Classification Regulations
New Entity Classification Regulations
by J. William Callison
J. William Callision, Denver,
is with the firm of Faegre
& Benson LLP. He has
written treatises on
Partnership Law and
Practice (Clark Boardman
Callaghan, 1992) and
Limited Liability Companies
(West, 1994)
is with the firm of Faegre
& Benson LLP. He has
written treatises on
Partnership Law and
Practice (Clark Boardman
Callaghan, 1992) and
Limited Liability Companies
(West, 1994)
On December 18, 1996, the Internal Revenue Service
("Service") issued final regulations ("New
Classification Regulations" or "NCR") that
create a new simplified and elective regime for classifying
unincorporated business organizations.1 The NCR, which became
effective January 1, 1997, replaced preexisting
classification rules that had become laden with complexity
The Service initially indicated it was considering
simplification in April 1995,2 and issued proposed
regulations in May 1996.3 The proposed regulations were well
received, and the NCR follow the general outline of the
proposed regulations
Under the New Classification Regulations, most types of
domestic business organizations, other than corporations,
will be treated as tax partnerships. As a result, domestic
limited partnerships ("LPs") and limited liability
companies ("LLCs") can now omit or simplify
provisions in their governing documents addressing continuity
of life, free transferability of interests and centralized
management. In addition, the NCR permit single-member LLCs
with pass-through tax treatment.
The New Classification Regulations are important because they
will accelerate use of LLCs and other unicorporated business
entities. This article discusses both the technical rules and
planning opportunities created by these new regulations that
should be of interest to lawyers representing business
clients.
THE PRIOR CLASSIFICATION FRAMEWORK
Historically, unincorporated business organizations, such as
general partnerships, LPs and LLCs, have been classified
either as "partnerships" or as "associations
taxable as corporations" for federal income tax
purposes. Partnerships are defined for tax purposes to
include syndicates, groups, pools, joint ventures, or other
unincorporated organizations, through which any business,
financial operation, or venture is carried on, that are not
trusts, estates, or corporations.4 Corporations are defined
for tax purposes to include associations, joint stock
companies, and insurance companies.5 In addition, certain
publicly traded partnerships, which would otherwise be taxed
as partnerships, are subject to corporate taxation.6
Prior to the New Classification Regulations, the
classification regulations ("Old Regulations") had
set forth a two-step approach for classifying domestic
entities and foreign entities.7 First, an entity was
classified as either a trust or as some other form of
association, depending on whether the organization possessed
(a) associates and (b) a profit motive. Trusts lack both
characteristics; associations do not. Second, associations
were classified either as partnerships or as corporations
based on the presence or absence of four corporate
characteristics: continuity of life, free transferability of
interests, centralized management, and limited liability.
The Old Regulations provided that unincorporated associations
were classified as corporations if they possessed a
preponderance (i.e., a majority) of the corporate
characteristics, and as partnerships if they lacked a
preponderance of the corporate characteristics.8 Therefore, a
Colorado LLC in which the articles of organization and the
operating agreement created continuity of life and
centralized management would be taxed as a corporation since
every Colorado LLC possessed the corporate characteristic of
limited liability. Conversely, if an LLC possessed one or two
corporate characteristics, it would be taxed as a
partnership.
The Service supplemented the Old Regulations with numerous
Revenue Rulings and Revenue Procedures setting forth rules
concerning the four primary corporate characteristics.9
Although unincorporated business organizations typically
could achieve partnership status under the Old Regulations,
taxpayers and their advisers often spent substantial energy
reviewing authority and ensuring that an organization lacked
at least two corporate characteristics. This situation was
complicated by the fact that, particularly with LLCs, which
always possessed the limited liability characteristic and
which provided structural flexibility, there often was a
client desire for a structure that possessed the corporate
characteristics.
For example, LLC clients frequently desire business
continuity despite an owner's dissociation from the
entity (thereby potentially creating continuity of life under
the Old Regulations) and manager management (thereby often
creating centralized management under the Old Regulations)
When combined with limited liability, a LLC that was
structured to meet the client's business goals without
sufficient sensitivity to the latest tax authority could have
been classified as a corporation under the Old Regulations.
Many tax counsel can relate stories of reviewing LLC
documentation and discovering that the elements of corporate
classification...
To continue reading
Request your trial