Disciplinary Case Summaries

Publication year1995
Pages2385
24 Colo.Law. 2385
Colorado Lawyer
1995.

1995, October, Pg. 2385. Disciplinary Case Summaries




2385


Vol. 24, No. 10, Pg. 2385

Disciplinary Case Summaries

The forms of discipline, both public and private, are set forth in C.R.C.P. Rule 241.7. Disbarment is the revocation of a lawyer's license. Suspension is the temporary interruption of a lawyer's privilege to practice. Public censure is a verbal reproach issued by the Colorado Supreme Court in open session and then published with the Court's other Opinions. Private censure is either a verbal reproach issued by the Colorado Supreme Court in Chambers or a written reproach mailed to the lawyer. Admonition is a letter of disapproval issued by the Grievance Committee and usually is mailed to the lawyer. A lawyer who receives a letter of admonition may demand that it be vacated and that a complaint be filed against him by Disciplinary Counsel.

Table(fn1)
(through July 1995)

Requests for investigation filed in 1995 875

Docketed for investigation 240

Not docketed for investigation 438

Review in progress 196

In abeyance 1

Cases dismissed by the inquiry panels in 1995 145

Letters of admonition sent in 1995 67

Cases in which reasonable cause was found in 1995 79

Cases pending before the inquiry panels on 07/31 318

1 Figures supplied by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel.

Public disciplinary and disability decisions are listed below. Decisions issued by Opinion appear in their entirety in the Colorado Supreme Court "Opinions" section of The Colorado Lawyer. Public disciplinary decisions involving issues that are not routine are summarized below, together with all private censures and, when space permits, selected admonishments. Occasionally, articles will appear in this space in lieu of summaries or with fewer of them.


Public Decisions

Charles Stephen Cantrell: The Supreme Court publicly censured the lawyer on July 24, 1995, and assessed costs of $52.29 against him, following its approval of his conditional admission of misconduct.

Robert T. Clark: The Supreme Court suspended the respondent on July 24, 1995, for one year and one day, effective immediately, and assessed costs of $145.55 against him.

The respondent was suspended from the practice of law on June 23, 1993, because of failure to comply with mandatory continuing legal education requirements. Despite receiving actual notice of his...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT