Disciplinary Case Summaries

Publication year1993
Pages315
CitationVol. 22 No. 2 Pg. 315
22 Colo.Law. 315
Colorado Lawyer
1993.

1993, February, Pg. 315. Disciplinary Case Summaries




315


Vol. 22, No. 2, Pg. 315

Disciplinary Case Summaries

Table1
(through November 1992)

Requests for investigation filed in 19921285

Docketed for investigation507

Not docketed for investigation665

Preliminary inquiries in progress87

Review in progress8

In abeyance13

Cases dismissed by the inquiry panels in 1992243

Letters of admonition sent in 199286

Cases in which reasonable cause was found in 199276

Cases pending before the inquiry panels on 11/30334

1Figures supplied by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel

Public disciplinary and disability decisions are listed below. Those issued by opinion appear in their entirety in the Colorado Supreme Court "Opinions" section of The Colorado Lawyer. Public disciplinary decisions involving issues that are not routine are summarized below, together with all private censures and selected admonishments. Occasionally, articles will appear in this space in lieu of summaries or with fewer of them.


Public Decisions

Rick J. Brown: The court disbarred the respondent on November 9, 1992, and assessed costs of $573.77 against him.

John W. Dalton: The court publicly censured the respondent on November 9, 1992, and assessed costs of $1,095.62 against him, following its approval of his conditional admission of misconduct.

Among other things, in his response to the request for investigation initiating a part of the disciplinary proceeding, the lawyer charged a complaining witness with filing a frivolous and groundless action against him. Moreover, despite the immunity granted by C.R.C.P. Rule 241.25(e), which states that all requests for investigation submitted to the Supreme Court, Grievance Committee, Committee counsel or disciplinary counsel, and all complaints filed with the Grievance Committee, shall be absolutely privileged and no lawsuit may be predicated thereon, the lawyer claimed that the complaining witness was liable to him for damages and the costs of defending the grievance. The lawyer admitted violating DR1-102(A)(5) by engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, as well as C.R.C.P. Rule 241.25(e).

Robert Kevin Kelley: The court disbarred the respondent on November 9, 1992, assessed costs of $544.40 against him, and ordered him to make restitution prior to any application for...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT