Disciplinary Case Summaries

Publication year1989
Pages281
18 Colo.Law. 281
Colorado Lawyer
1989.

1989, February, Pg. 281. Disciplinary Case Summaries




281



Vol. 18, No. 2, Pg. 281

Disciplinary Case Summaries

Table
(November, 1988)

MonthYear

Request for investigation forms distributed2953232

Requests for investigation filed82930

Docketed for investigation on receipt26345

Not docketed for investigation on receipt16195

Preliminary inquiries made as of 11/3040390

Cases placed in abeyance00

Docketed as of 10/31 after preliminary inquiry1396

Not docketed as of 10/31 after preliminary inquiry25258

Letters of admonition sent867

Cases in which reasonable cause was found9115

Cases pending before the Inquiry Panels on 11/30302

Cases resulting in public discipline are printed in their entirety in the Colorado Supreme Court "Opinions" section of The Colorado Lawyer. Those public cases which involve issues that are not routine are summarized here together with all private censures and selected admonishments. Occasionally, articles will be published here in lieu of summaries or with a smaller number of them.


Public Discipline

John E. Kochel: The court disbarred the respondent on November 14, 1988, following his earlier disbarment in Pennsylvania. Costs of $289.95 were also assessed against him.

The respondent was first disciplined in Pennsylvania when, on March 23, 1987, he was suspended for three months from the practice of law in that state for conversion of client escrow funds and neglect of a legal matter entrusted to him. The respondent also failed to notify Committee Counsel of his suspension as required by C.R.C.P. Rule 241.17(b).

During reciprocal disciplinary proceedings in Colorado, which arose due to the suspension of the respondent in Pennsylvania, it was learned that the respondent had been disbarred on consent on January 12, 1988, in Pennsylvania. Following the filing of an amended complaint in the Colorado proceeding, the respondent stipulated to his disbarment in this state as well.

Arlan I. Preblud: The court suspended the respondent for three years on November 28, 1988, and assessed costs of $1,242.99 against him.

The respondent pleaded guilty and was convicted on May 23, 1986, in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado of one count of securities fraud. Securities fraud is a felony and therefore a serious crime as defined in C.R.C.P. Rule 241.16(e). While the criminal charge...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT