1972, April, Pg. 46. CROSS AND RE-CROSS.

1 Colo.Law. 46

Colorado Lawyer

1972.

1972, April, Pg. 46.

CROSS AND RE-CROSS

461972, April, Pg. 46CROSS AND RE-CROSSEDITORS' NOTE: In the early weeks of publication many of our readers called or wrote to express opinions or offer suggestions, and the editors found this response gratifying. The letters printed below are some of the reactions we have received, and we welcome further expression of opinion by our readers to contents, style and format of the magazine. Please address correspondence to: Editor, The Colorado Lawyer, Suite 200, 331 Fourteenth Street, Denver, Colorado 80202.

Gentlemen:

Let me extend my congratulations on the Association's newest venture, The Colorado Lawyer. In format, style and content, it is a most useful tool and very nicely fills the void created by the demise of Dicta.Very truly yours,

Karl E. Miller

Hill AFB

Utah

Gentlemen:

I would like to express a few comments concerning The Colorado Lawyer which is now being prepared by the Bar Association and supplied to all members. I find the articles of considerable interest and well worth reading and many of them are worthy of saving and filing away for future reference.

However, the publication is quite bulky....

I realize many law offices probably do not receive the Pacific advance sheets and possibly these reprints are valuable to them . . . but with limited office space for a library, it is almost impossible to keep and retain every issue of The Colorado Lawyer.

As a result I have found that I must remove by tearing the interesting articles each month and throw away the balance....

Possibly no other members of the Association have encountered this or a similar problem, but so far as I am concerned, the printing and reprinting of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals decisions is a waste of money and I would like to have more in the way of articles...