Suffolk Journal of Trial & Appellate Advocacy

Issue Number

Latest documents

• ONE SHOULD NOT PAY FOR ALL--DRUG QUANTITY TRIGGERING MANDATORY MINIMUMS SHOULD BE INDIVIDUALIZED IN CONSPIRACY SENTENCING.
• THE USE AND ABUSE OF DOGS IN THE WITNESS BOX.
• 'NOT TESTED ON ANIMALS': THE FUTURE OF COSMETIC ANIMAL TESTING IN THE U.S. AND BEYOND.
• INTERNATIONAL LAW--EXTRAJUDICIAL KILLINGS: ACTS OF TERRORISM OR ACTS OF ELABORATE COVER-UPS?--SULLIVAN V. REPUBLIC OF CUBA, 891 F.3D 6 (1ST CIR. 2018).
• COMBATTING SEXUAL MISCONDUCT: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION DURING THE #METOO ERA.
• EDITOR'S NOTE.
• CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--AMERICA'S DRONE WAR ABROAD--JABER V. UNITED STATES, 861 F.3D 241 (D.C. CIR. 2017).
• MASSACHUSETTS NONCOMPETITION AGREEMENT ACT: A ROSE OF A DIFFERENT COLOR.
• CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--EIGHTY-SIX THE SIXTH AMENDMENT: THE SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO COUNSEL APPLIES TO PREINDICTMENT PLEA NEGOTIATIONS TOO-TURNER V. UNITED STATES, 885 F.3D 949 (6TH CIR. 2018) (EN BANC).
• MORE TARIFFS, MORE PROTECTIONISM.

Featured documents

• Beyond the "embryonic stage": Younger v. Harris and "proceedings of substance on the merits" in the context of preliminary injunctive relief.
• Thinking outside of the box: why prisons are only part of the solution.
• The disadvantaged plaintiff: is it time to revisit the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act?
• THE USE AND ABUSE OF DOGS IN THE WITNESS BOX.
• HIT THE GROUND RUNNING: THE COMPLETE OPENING STATEMENT SUPPORTED BY EMPIRICAL RESEARCH AND ILLUSTRATIONS.
• Raise or lose: appellate discretion and principled decision-making.
• ALL FOR ONE AND ONE FOR ... SOME? CHALLENGING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF MASSACHUSETTS CHARTER SCHOOL LEGISLATION AFTER DOE NO. 1 V. SECRETARY OF EDUCATION.
• REEXAMINING THE ADMISSIBILITY OF THE DEFENDANT'S NON-INCULPATORY STATEMENTS AT TRIAL.
• Constitutional law - Seventh Circuit denies sovereign immunity defense to counterclaims from appealing state agency - Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. Phoenix International Software, Inc., 653 F.3D 448 (7th Cir. 2011).
• CIVIL RIGHTS - MEDICAL MARIJUANA RECOGNIZED AS FACIALLY REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION UNDER HANDICAP DISCRIMINATION CLAIM IN MASSACHUSETTS - BARBUTO V. ADVANTAGE SALES AND MKTG., LLC.