Vol. 74 No. 3, June 2009
Index
- Foreword: Sandra Day O'Connor, Earl F. Nelson, and state judicial selection and retention.
- The essentials and expendables of the Missouri plan: the 2009 Earl F. Nelson Lecture.
- We have met the special interests, and we are they.
- A plea for reality.
- Federal and state judicial selection in an interest group perspective.
- Parties, interest groups, and systemic change.
- Reconciling the judicial ideal and the democratic impulse in judicial retention elections.
- Do retention elections work?
- Using judicial performance evaluations to supplement inappropriate voter cues and enhance judicial legitimacy.
- Comments on the White, Caufield, and Tarr articles.
- The politics of merit selection.
- The Missouri nonpartisan court plan: the least political method of selecting high quality judges.
- The Missouri plan in national perspective.
- The bench, the bar, and everyone else: some questions about state judicial selection.
- Exporting the Missouri plan: judicial appointment commissions.
- The high cost of low-cost workers: Missouri enacts new law targeting employers of unauthorized workers.
- There but for the grace of God go I: the right of cross-examination in social security disability hearings.
- The Eighth Circuit loosens the grip of the bankruptcy gag rule, but holds attorneys to advertising disclosure requirement: Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P.A. v. United States.
- Fender bender lottery: direct victims and bystanders in recovery for the negligent infliction of emotional distress.
- The inadequacies of Missouri intestacy law: addressing the rights of posthumously conceived children.