Jones Law Review
- Equal Access to Justice Act cuts off equal access for social security claimants.
- Forced competence: a defendant's right to reject involuntarily administered antipsychotic drug treatment.
- Limiting speech at funerals: analysis and proposal for jurisprudence.
- Can Jiminy Cricket be silenced? Congressional spending powers, federalism, and the federal refusal clause.
- Capital punishment: advocates' deadly combination of inadequacy and misconduct.
- Green Tree v. Randolph: will this court's decision lessen the effect of the FAA in consumer arbitration?
- Trott v. Brinks and reimbursement: why Alabama's third-party statute should be amended.
- The extraterritorial application of Title VII: an argument for an informal foreign compulsion defense.
- Griffin v. UNOCAL: a solution to the Garrett Conundrum and the end of the last exposure rule.
- Determining mental retardation in capital defendants: using a strict IQ cut-off number will allow the execution of many that Atkins intended to spare: ex parte State (Smith v. State).
- Domestic violence, flawed interpretations of 42 U.S.C. s. 1437D(l)(6), sexual harassment in public housing, and municipal violations of the Eighth Amendment: making women homeless and keeping them homeless.
- The Roberts Court and the death penalty code.
- Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties Union.
- A policy decision in the high court: how global warming eroded the standing requirement: Massachusetts v. EPA.
- Alabama law of dedication and reservation: it's a good thing: Beachcroft Properties, LLP v. City of Alabaster.
- Civil forfeitures of real property in Alabama: lack of knowledge is power to an innocent owner.
- Some time in the shade: giving the public's legal counsel some relief under Alabama's Sunshine Law.
- Alabama's evolving standard of admissibility for expert scientific testimony.
- Our dirty little secret recording: a history and critique of ethical rules regarding lawyers secretly recording conversations.
- The struggle in Alabama for constitutional reform.
- Access to civil commitment proceedings & records in Alabama: balancing privacy rights and the presumption of openness.
- Limiting speech at funerals: analysis and proposal for jurisprudence.
- The Garcetti test: limiting a public employee's freedom of speech and the constitutional implications on academic speech: Garcetti v. Ceballos.
- Exclusion of the exclusionary rule: Hudson v. Michigan.
- The demise of the knock-and-announce rule: Hudson v. Michigan.
- Water resource protection in Alabama: the need for a paradigm change.
- The Fourth Amendment's consent to entry exception: protecting the castle from the co-tenant's consent: Georgia V. Randolph.
- The current state of the Voting Rights Act: should it be renewed, amended, or allowed to expire?
- Opening remarks.
- Helping graduates who fail the bar examination.
- Procedure trumps justice: judicial inactivism in Alabama and its unjust result.
- Thou shalt not expunge Mobile Press Register, Inc. v. Lackey.
- Trying children as adults.
- Atkins v. Virginia: the costs of arriving at a decision to exempt the mentally retarded from execution.
- Chambers v. United States: filling in the gaps when interpreting the Armed Career Criminal Act.
- Regulating capital markets: competition, harmonization and cooperation - a theoretical inquiry.
- Binding predispute arbitration clauses in Alabama: a checkered past but a solid future.
- Racism on our juries: the impossibility of impartiality in capital cases.
- You be the judge: avoiding attorney discipline by taking the bench: Ex parte Alabama State Bar.
- Preparation of the trial lawyer for mediation.
- Promoting or frustrating the statute of frauds? Implications from Holman v. Childersburg Bancorporation, Inc.
- Walls v. Alpharma: is the learned intermediary doctrine the right cure for pharmacists in Alabama?
- Class arbitration: someone please forward a copy of the Bazzle decision to the Alabama Supreme Court.
- Challenges and opportunities in the law.
- What a poor defense! Exploring the ineffectiveness of counsel for the poor and searching for a solution.
- The logical conclusion to reasonably calculated notice: actual notice: Jones v. Flowers.
- Reformulating medical malpractice: Ex parte Healthsouth Corp. and its ramifications for medical malpractice law in Alabama.
- The year-and-a-day rule: a common law vestige that has outlived its purpose.