Jones Law Review

Issue Number

Latest documents

• The extraterritorial application of Title VII: an argument for an informal foreign compulsion defense.
• Chambers v. United States: filling in the gaps when interpreting the Armed Career Criminal Act.
• Class arbitration: someone please forward a copy of the Bazzle decision to the Alabama Supreme Court.
• Procedure trumps justice: judicial inactivism in Alabama and its unjust result.
• Griffin v. UNOCAL: a solution to the Garrett Conundrum and the end of the last exposure rule.
• Domestic violence, flawed interpretations of 42 U.S.C. s. 1437D(l)(6), sexual harassment in public housing, and municipal violations of the Eighth Amendment: making women homeless and keeping them homeless.
• You be the judge: avoiding attorney discipline by taking the bench: Ex parte Alabama State Bar.
• The Roberts Court and the death penalty code.
• Capital punishment: advocates' deadly combination of inadequacy and misconduct.
• Determining mental retardation in capital defendants: using a strict IQ cut-off number will allow the execution of many that Atkins intended to spare: ex parte State (Smith v. State).

Featured documents

• Equal Access to Justice Act cuts off equal access for social security claimants.
• Forced competence: a defendant's right to reject involuntarily administered antipsychotic drug treatment.
• Limiting speech at funerals: analysis and proposal for jurisprudence.
• Can Jiminy Cricket be silenced? Congressional spending powers, federalism, and the federal refusal clause.
• Capital punishment: advocates' deadly combination of inadequacy and misconduct.
• Green Tree v. Randolph: will this court's decision lessen the effect of the FAA in consumer arbitration?
• Trott v. Brinks and reimbursement: why Alabama's third-party statute should be amended.
• The extraterritorial application of Title VII: an argument for an informal foreign compulsion defense.
• Griffin v. UNOCAL: a solution to the Garrett Conundrum and the end of the last exposure rule.
• Determining mental retardation in capital defendants: using a strict IQ cut-off number will allow the execution of many that Atkins intended to spare: ex parte State (Smith v. State).