-
Jones Law Review
- Publisher:
- Thomas Goode Jones School of Law
- Publication date:
- 2009-06-05
- Copyright:
- COPYRIGHT TV Trade Media, Inc.<br/>COPYRIGHT GALE, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Latest documents
- The extraterritorial application of Title VII: an argument for an informal foreign compulsion defense.
- Procedure trumps justice: judicial inactivism in Alabama and its unjust result.
- Chambers v. United States: filling in the gaps when interpreting the Armed Career Criminal Act.
- Class arbitration: someone please forward a copy of the Bazzle decision to the Alabama Supreme Court.
- Griffin v. UNOCAL: a solution to the Garrett Conundrum and the end of the last exposure rule.
- Domestic violence, flawed interpretations of 42 U.S.C. s. 1437D(l) (6), sexual harassment in public housing, and municipal violations of the Eighth Amendment: making women homeless and keeping them homeless.
- You be the judge: avoiding attorney discipline by taking the bench: Ex parte Alabama State Bar.
- The Roberts Court and the death penalty code.
- Capital punishment: advocates' deadly combination of inadequacy and misconduct.
- Racism on our juries: the impossibility of impartiality in capital cases.
Featured documents
- The Roberts Court and the death penalty code.
- Capital punishment: advocates' deadly combination of inadequacy and misconduct.
- Procedure trumps justice: judicial inactivism in Alabama and its unjust result.
- Regulating capital markets: competition, harmonization and cooperation - a theoretical inquiry.
- Access to civil commitment proceedings & records in Alabama: balancing privacy rights and the presumption of openness.
- The extraterritorial application of Title VII: an argument for an informal foreign compulsion defense.
- Griffin v. UNOCAL: a solution to the Garrett Conundrum and the end of the last exposure rule.
- The logical conclusion to reasonably calculated notice: actual notice: Jones v. Flowers.
- Limiting speech at funerals: analysis and proposal for jurisprudence.
- Promoting or frustrating the statute of frauds? Implications from Holman v. Childersburg Bancorporation, Inc.