Jones Law Review
- Publisher:
- Thomas Goode Jones School of Law
- Publication date:
- 2009-06-05
- Copyright:
- COPYRIGHT TV Trade Media, Inc.<br/>COPYRIGHT GALE, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Issue Number
- Vol. 13 No. 2, March 2009
- Vol. 13 No. 1, September 2008
- Vol. 12 No. 2, March 2008
- Vol. 12 No. 1, September 2007
- Vol. 11 No. 2, March 2007
- Vol. 11 No. 1, September - September 2006
- Vol. 10 No. 1, January 2006
- Vol. 9 No. 1, January 2005
- Vol. 8 No. 1, January 2004
- Vol. 7 No. 1, January 2003
- Vol. 6 No. 1, January 2002
Latest documents
- The extraterritorial application of Title VII: an argument for an informal foreign compulsion defense.
- Chambers v. United States: filling in the gaps when interpreting the Armed Career Criminal Act.
- Class arbitration: someone please forward a copy of the Bazzle decision to the Alabama Supreme Court.
- Procedure trumps justice: judicial inactivism in Alabama and its unjust result.
- Griffin v. UNOCAL: a solution to the Garrett Conundrum and the end of the last exposure rule.
- Domestic violence, flawed interpretations of 42 U.S.C. s. 1437D(l)(6), sexual harassment in public housing, and municipal violations of the Eighth Amendment: making women homeless and keeping them homeless.
- You be the judge: avoiding attorney discipline by taking the bench: Ex parte Alabama State Bar.
- Capital punishment: advocates' deadly combination of inadequacy and misconduct.
- Determining mental retardation in capital defendants: using a strict IQ cut-off number will allow the execution of many that Atkins intended to spare: ex parte State (Smith v. State).
- Racism on our juries: the impossibility of impartiality in capital cases.
Featured documents
- Equal Access to Justice Act cuts off equal access for social security claimants.
- Forced competence: a defendant's right to reject involuntarily administered antipsychotic drug treatment.
- Griffin v. UNOCAL: a solution to the Garrett Conundrum and the end of the last exposure rule.
- Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties Union.
- Alabama's evolving standard of admissibility for expert scientific testimony.
- Our dirty little secret recording: a history and critique of ethical rules regarding lawyers secretly recording conversations.
- Thou shalt not expunge Mobile Press Register, Inc. v. Lackey.
- A policy decision in the high court: how global warming eroded the standing requirement: Massachusetts v. EPA.
- Determining mental retardation in capital defendants: using a strict IQ cut-off number will allow the execution of many that Atkins intended to spare: ex parte State (Smith v. State).
- Walls v. Alpharma: is the learned intermediary doctrine the right cure for pharmacists in Alabama?