Harvard Journal of Law & Technology
- Publisher:
- Harvard Law School, Harvard Journal of Law & Technology
- Publication date:
- 2019-02-26
- ISBN:
- 0897-3393
- Copyright:
- COPYRIGHT TV Trade Media, Inc.<br/>COPYRIGHT GALE, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Issue Number
Latest documents
- THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT IS AN INEFFICIENT MONOPOLY: A REPLY TO LEE AND LEMLEY.(response to William F. Lee & Mark A. Lemley, Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, vol. 37, p. 255, 2024)
- DAMAGES DONE: POST-ECOFACTOR PATENT DAMAGES APPORTIONMENT AND THE PUSH TO REDOUBLE INJUNCTIVE RELIEF.
- M&A EXCEPTIONALISM IN PRIVACY LAW.(mergers and acquisitions)
- AGENTIZING PRIVACY PREFERENCES WITHOUT PRIVATIZING DATA PROTECTION POLICY.
- SAFE SEX IN THE AGE OF BIG TECH FEMINISM.
- BAN COOKIE BANNERS: A CASE STUDY IN TECH REGULATION.
- COMPUTE MONITORING: REVIVING THE ENCRYPTION BACKDOOR DEBATE.
- TRADITIONAL AND COMPUTATIONAL CANONS.
- TAINTED SOURCE CODE.
- RECONSIDERING THE PATENT JURISDICTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION.
Featured documents
- PUBLIC SPACE, PRIVATE PATENTS: UPDATING INTERNATIONAL SPACE LAW TO PROTECT PATENTS IN OUTER SPACE.
- Identity theft: making the known unknowns known.
- Barriers to the voluntary adoption of Internet tagging proposals.
- The denial of a general performance right in sound recordings: a policy that facilitates our democratic civil society?
- The optimal scope of FDA regulation of genetic tests: meeting challenges and keeping promises.
- GENERIC DRUGS AND THE FUTURE OF "SKINNY LABELS".
- Construing patent claims according to their "interpretive community": a call for an attorney-plus-artisan perspective.
- THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT IS AN INEFFICIENT MONOPOLY: A REPLY TO LEE AND LEMLEY.(response to William F. Lee & Mark A. Lemley, Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, vol. 37, p. 255, 2024)
- Construing patent claims according to their "interpretive community": a call for an attorney-plus-artisan perspective.
- Regulating search.