Environmental Law

- Publisher:
- Lewis & Clark Northwestern School of Law
- Publication date:
- 2009-05-13
- ISBN:
- 0046-2276
- Copyright:
- COPYRIGHT TV Trade Media, Inc.<br/>COPYRIGHT GALE, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Issue Number
Latest documents
- LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT.
- INTRODUCTION.
- ADVANCING ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND JUSTICE: A CALL FOR ASSESSMENT AND OVERSIGHT OF HEALTHCARE WASTE APHA POLICY STATEMENT NUMBER 20224, ADOPTED NOVEMBER 2022.
- GREENING THE GREEN RUSH: HOW ADDRESSING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF CANNABIS LEGALIZATION CAN ENHANCE SOCIAL EQUITY AND REMEDIATE THE HARMS OF THE WAR ON DRUGS.
- LEVERAGING FOREIGN INVESTMENTS TO SUPPORT CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION IN THE GLOBAL SOUTH: CERTIFYING CLIMATE-NEXUS INVESTMENTS AND CONDITIONING PROTECTIONS.
- RIGHTS OF NATURE IN HAWAI'I: PRESERVING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NATURAL RESOURCES AND CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE.
- ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE IN POLLUTION HOTSPOTS AND SECTIONS 7 & 15 OF THE CHARTER: THE CASE OF THE AAMJIWNAANG COMMUNITY IN "CHEMICAL VALLEY".
- TRANSMISSION: A NEW HOPE: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE BIDEN INFRASTRUCTURE ACT ON CORRIDOR DESIGNATION.
- THE EVER-PRESENT NEED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE.
- CLIMATE LAW EDUCATION AND ITS PLACE IN CANADIAN LAW SCHOOLS.
Featured documents
- ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE IN POLLUTION HOTSPOTS AND SECTIONS 7 & 15 OF THE CHARTER: THE CASE OF THE AAMJIWNAANG COMMUNITY IN "CHEMICAL VALLEY".
- CLIMATE LAW EDUCATION AND ITS PLACE IN CANADIAN LAW SCHOOLS.
- THE VALUE OF REGULATING CLIMATE DISCLOSURES.
- WILDERNESS LAW IN THE ANTHROPOCENE: PRAGMATISM AND PURISM.
- AES v. Steadfast and the concept of foreseeability in climate change litigation.
- CONSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, OR, THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONSEQUENCES OF INSISTING THAT THE ENVIRONMENT IS EVERYBODY'S BUSINESS.
- SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS LAW? THE KEY ROLE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND FINANCE.
- The tragedy of the vital commons.
- FROM "SIT AND WAIT" TO "PROACTIVE REGULATION": A MODEL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION OF PRIVATE PROPERTY.
- ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO. V. GREGORY A. CHRISTIAN ET AL.: CAN STRICT LIABILITY BE TOO STRICT?