Argumentation and Advocacy

Issue Number

Latest documents

• Ad hoc reviewers.
• Sound arguments.
• Reinventing doxa: public opinion polling as deliberative discourse.
• The sublime rhetoric of Pascal's wager.
• Putting powerfulness in its place: a study on discursive style in public discussion and its impact.
• Instagrams that wound: Punctum, visual enthymemes, and the visual argumentation of the Transportation Security Administration.
• Bright lines or blurred lines? Universal background checks and the NRA slippery slope argument.
• When good arguments do not work: post-dialectics, argument assemblages, and the networks of climate skepticism.
• Strategic maneuvering in dispute mediation.
• Romney, Obama, and the 47%: gaffes and representative anecdotes in the 2012 presidential campaign.

Featured documents

• Reinventing doxa: public opinion polling as deliberative discourse.
• Tinkering with the machinery of death: the body-as-gauge in discourses about capital punishment.
• Bright lines or blurred lines? Universal background checks and the NRA slippery slope argument.
• How much jail time? Returning women to the abortion debate.
• When good arguments do not work: post-dialectics, argument assemblages, and the networks of climate skepticism.
• Do presidential debates matter? Examining a decade of campaign debate effects.
• How do statistical and narrative evidence affect persuasion?: the role of evidentiary features.
• For what noble cause: Cindy Sheehan and the politics of grief in public spheres of argument.
• "I thought we settled this?!" Antecedents and consequences of resolution of an initial episode in a serial argument.
• The debate authors working group model for collaborative knowledge production in forensics scholarship.