Chapter 19 Comparative Fault
Index
- Section 19.1 Generally
- Section 19.2 Scope of Chapter
- Section 19.3 Gustafson
- Section 19.4 Uniform Comparative Fault Act Does Not Control When it Conflicts With Other Missouri Law
- Section 19.5 Comparative Fault Is an Affirmative Defense and Must Be Pleaded
- Section 19.6 If a Defendant Withdraws Comparative Fault as a Defense, the Plaintiff May Still Be Entitled to a Comparative Fault Instruction
- Section 19.7 Comparative Fault Is Not Limited to Claims of Negligence
- Section 19.8 Negligence
- Section 19.9 Conduct of Defendant
- Section 19.10 Conduct of Plaintiff—Rescue Doctrine
- Section 19.11 Product Liability Claims
- Section 19.12 Other Strict Liability Claims
- Section 19.13 Breach of Warranty
- Section 19.14 Assumption of Risk
- Section 19.15 Misuse of a Product
- Section 19.16 Failure to Mitigate
- Section 19.17 Premises Liability
- Section 19.18 Purely Economic Loss
- Section 19.19 No Reduction of Punitive Damages
- Section 19.20 Workers’ Compensation
- Section 19.21 Official Immunity and Sovereign Immunity
- Section 19.22 Fault Is Assessed Only Against Parties Present at Trial
- Section 19.23 Effect of One or More Defendants Settling Before Trial
- Section 19.24 Reduction of Plaintiff’s Recovery Based on Comparative Fault in Derivative Claims
- Section 19.25 Effect of Fault in a Wrongful Death Action
- Section 19.26 Missouri Approved Jury Instructions for Comparative Fault Cases
- Section 19.27 Claims and Counterclaims Are Not Subject to a Setoff
- Section 19.28 Effect of Reversal of a Finding on Liability
- Section 19.29 Conflict-of-Law Issues
- Section 19.30 Joint and Several Liability and Contribution
- Section 19.31 Effect of Gustafson
- Section 19.32 2000 Revisions to § 537.067, RSMo
- Section 19.33 2005 Revisions to § 537.067, RSMo
- Section 19.34 Enforcement of Current Rule Regarding Joint and Several Liability
- Section 19.35 Pleadings
- Section 19.36 Discovery
- Section 19.37 Drugs and Alcohol
- Section 19.38 Statutory Violations Related to Comparative Fault
- Section 19.39 Fault of Nonparties
- Section 19.40 Knowledge of Risk
- Section 19.41 Admissions
- Section 19.42 Substantial Evidence, Not Mere Conjecture, Is Required
- Section 19.43 Jury Question When Evidence of Comparative Fault Is in Conflict
- Section 19.44 Comparative Fault of Minors
- Section 19.45 Failure to Follow Physician Instructions
- Section 19.46 Comparative Fault Submissible
- Section 19.47 Comparative Fault Not Submissible
- Section 19.48 Railroad Crossing
- Section 19.49 Comparative Fault Submissible
- Section 19.50 Comparative Fault Not Submissible
- Section 19.51 Slip and Fall
- Section 19.52 Product Liability
- Section 19.53 Construction
- Section 19.54 Assumption of Risk
- Section 19.55 Legal Malpractice
- Section 19.56 Open and Obvious
- Section 19.57 Electric Line
- Section 19.58 Wrongful Death
- Section 19.59 Foreseeable Risk
- Section 19.60 Federal Employers’ Liability Act
- Section 19.61 MAI 22.03
- Section 19.62 Submissibility of the Plaintiff’s Fault
- Section 19.63 Assumption of Risk
- Section 19.64 Converse Instruction
- Section 19.65 Definitions
- Section 19.66 Disjunctive Submissions
- Section 19.67 Duty to Submit Instruction
- Section 19.68 Federal Employers’ Liability Act
- Section 19.69 Fault Other Than Negligence
- Section 19.70 Invitation of Error
- Section 19.71 MAI 17.00 Series
- Section 19.72 MAI 19.01
- Section 19.73 MAI 37.01 Modification
- Section 19.74 Medical Malpractice
- Section 19.75 Only One Comparative Fault Instruction Is Given
- Section 19.76 Premises Liability
- Section 19.77 Preservation of Error
- Section 19.78 Product Liability
- Section 19.79 Released Parties in Medical Malpractice Cases
- Section 19.80 Respondeat Superior
- Section 19.81 Requirement of Pleading or Trial by Consent
- Section 19.82 Roving Commission
- Section 19.83 Standard of Care
- Section 19.84 Closing Argument
- Section 19.85 Verdict
- Section 19.86 Posttrial Motions
- Section 19.87 Costs
- Section 19.88 Harmless Error—No Fault Assessed to Defendant
- Section 19.89 Harmless Error—No Fault Assessed to Plaintiff
- Section 19.90 Facts in Evidence
- Section 19.91 Preservation of Instructional Error at Trial
- Section 19.92 Preservation of Instructional Error on Appeal
- Section 19.93 Substantial Evidence to Support the Verdict
- Section 19.94 Evidentiary Rulings
- Section 19.95 Plaintiff Invited Comparative Fault Instruction
- Section 19.96 Generally
- Section 19.97 Other Issues
- Section 19.98 Aviation
- Section 19.99 Pure Comparative Fault vs. Modified Comparative Fault
- Section 19.100 Personal Injury Protection Benefits
- Section 19.101 Uninsured Motorist Coverage
- Section 19.102 Commercial Law
- Section 19.103 Construction
- Section 19.104 Generally
- Section 19.105 Federal Employers’ Liability Act Jury Instructions
- Section 19.106 Assumption of Risk in Federal Employers’ Liability Act Cases
- Section 19.107 Joint Venture
- Section 19.108 Legal Malpractice
- Section 19.109 Instructions
- Section 19.110 Released Parties in Medical Malpractice
- Section 19.111 Contribution
- Section 19.112 Settlement
- Section 19.113 Submissibility
- Section 19.114 Open and Obvious Barred as a Matter of Law
- Section 19.115 Plaintiff’s Claim Not Barred as a Matter of Law
- Section 19.116 Intervening Cause
- Section 19.117 Even if Comparative Fault Is Submissible, Defendant Is Not Entitled
- Section 19.118 Submissibility
- Section 19.119 Nature of Danger
- Section 19.120 Section 537.765, RSMo
- Section 19.121 Assumption of Risk
- Section 19.122 Contribution
- Section 19.123 Sports Law
- Section 19.124 Railroad Crossing
- Section 19.125 Superseding or Intervening Causes
- Section 19.126 Worker’s Compensation Subrogation