Condemnation Law & Procedures in NY
- 19.1 II. Interest Rates Challenged
- 11.0 I. Introduction
- 3.1 II. The Eminent Domain Procedure Law
- 13.5 D. Prepare Your Cross-Examination
- 8.0 I. Introduction
- 5.6 A. Generally
- 11.9 X. Increments Are Managed In The Valuation Of An Integrated Plant
- Exhibit “4”
- 4.3
- 10.0 I. Introduction
- 15.1 II. Airspace Easements Generally
- 13.3 B. Stipulate To Facts
- Index
- 2.1 II. Procedural Aspects Of An Edpl &Sect; 207 Challenge
- 11.11 XII. Conclusion
- 13.7 F. Know Your Judge
- 18.6 VII. Condemnation Of An Economically Viable Utility System That Has Enjoyed The Benefits Of The “Regulatory Compact”
- 8.6 VII. Qualification Of Appraiser
- 11.6 VII. Lease Language Will Not Change The Compensability Of Trade Fixtures
- 13.2 A. Settle Cases That Should Be Settled
- 7.4 V. Assessment And Valuation
- 19.0 I. Introduction
- 5.3 B. Standing Of Fee Owner Where Title Is Conveyed After Vesting Of Title
- 16.2 III. Property Valuation
- 4.1 II. The Acquisition Of Property
- 7.5 VI. Conclusion
- 16.0 I. Introduction
- 15.3 IV. Compensation For Airspace Easements
- Exhibit 2
- 10.4 V. Conclusion
- 1.3 IV. Conclusion
- 18.3 IV. The “Rights Of Ownership” Vs. The “Regulatory Compact” Approaches
- 7.1 II. Specific Concepts
- 5.2 A. Generally
- 11.8 IX. A Trade Fixture Claimant Is Entitled To Compensation For All Trade Fixtures Available For Use In The Premises
- 8.2 III. How Real Property Is Valued
- 15.5 B. Kupster Realty Corp. V. State595
- 2.4 V. Challenges To Seqra Findings And To Edpl Procedures87
- 11.7 VIII. The Language Of A Chattel Mortgage Or U.C.C. Security Agreement Has Nothing To Do With The Compensability Of A Trade Fixture
- 2.0 I. Introduction
- 6.8
- 11.4 V. The Sum Of The Parts Exceed The Whole
- 20.1 II. Issues To Consider
- 22.2 III. Pre-Taking Abandonment
- Exhibit “1D”
- Exhibit “1H”
- 6.3 B. For-Profit Corporations
- 12.2 III. The Property Owner
- 9.1 II. Highest And Best Uses At Variance With EXIsting Zoning And/Or Other Regulations
- 1.1 II. Appropriation Criteria
- 13.0 I. Introduction
- Exhibit “1G”
- 18.4 V. Condemnation Of Economically Viable Systems Historically Subject To Unreasonable Rate Regulation
- Exhibit “1B”
- 12.3 IV. A View From The Bench
- 13.10 I. Treat The Court With Respect
- 10.3 IV. Role Of Highest And Best Use
- 13.9 H. The View
- 10.1 II. Damages
- Exhibit “3”
- 13.8 G. Make A Record
- 3.0 I. Background
- 5.0 I. Introduction
- Exhibit “1E”
- 4.0 I. Introduction
- 8.5 VI. Valuation Of Real Property In Other Contexts
- Appendix D
- 21.2 III. Business Valuation Methods
- 14.3 IV. The Present Posture Of The Courts
- Appendix A
- Exhibit “2B”
- Exhibit “2C”
- 6.1 II. Ownership Of Subject Property
- 19.2 III. Parameters Set
- 7.3 IV. Taxation
- 3.3 B. Articles 3 And 4
- 8.4 V. Tax Certiorari
- 13.12 K. Listen To The Court
- 11.5 VI. The Unit Rule Has No Application To Fixture Claims
- 13.6 E. Make Your Point
- 13.4 C. Be Prepared
- 5.4 C. Claims Where The Condemnation Occurs After Contract, But Before Closing
- 3.2 A. Articles 1 And 2
- 18.0 I. Introduction
- 21.4 V. Exceptions
- 5.5 III. Compelling Payment Where There Are Title Objections Or Competing Claims
- Appendices
- 2.3 IV. Challenges To Condemnor's Statutory Jurisdiction Or Authority
- 15.2 III. Establishing A Taking Of An Airspace Easement
- 18.5 VI. Condemnation Of Economically Unviable Systems
- 5.8 C. The Edpl Provision
- 17.0 I. Introduction
- 22.0 I. Introduction
- 12.4 V. Conclusion
- 6.0 I. Introduction
- Appendix C
- 11.3 IV. Fixture Test
- Appendix B
- 1.0 I. Introduction
- 7.0 I. Introduction
- 19.3 IV. Nature Of Proof Needed
- 18.2 III. Rcnld Vs. “Rate Base”
- 3.5 D. Articles 6 And 7
- 2.2 III. Constitutional Challenges59
- 11.10 XI. A Fixture Claimant Is Entitled To Interest To The Date Of Payment
- 22.1 II. Post-Taking Project Abandonment
- 10.2 III. Property Valuation
- Exhibit “1C”
- 9.2 III. The Highest And Best Use As Affected By The Pendency Of A Condemnation
- Appendix A
- 5.9 IV. Some Typical Errors In Lease Condemnation Clauses
- Exhibit 3
- 8.3 IV. Partial Takings
- 11.2 III. Removability Is Not A Test Of A Trade Fixture
- 12.1 II. The Condemnor
- 7.2 III. Finding Value
- 22.3 IV. Conclusion
- 3.4 C. Article 5
- 15.7 V. Conclusion
- 8.7 VIII. Requirement Of The Judicial Decision
- 14.2 III. Judicial Treatment Of Appraisals
- 15.0 I. Introduction
- 20.0 I. Introduction
- 9.0 I. Introduction
- 6.2 A. Property Owned By An Individual
- 21.1 II. The Rule Of Business Taking
- 14.1 II. An Admission
- Exhibit “1J”
- 20.2 III. Conclusion
- 8.1 II. Eminent Domain
- 16.1 II. Remediation Costs
- 6.4 C. Charitable Corporations
- Exhibit 1
- 4.2 III. Procedures For Litigating A Claim In The Court Of Claims
- 6.7 A. Judgments And Liens—Government
- Exhibit “1F”
- 5.7 B. The Lease/Condemnation Clause
- 18.1 II. Specialty Properties And The Rcnld Approach To Value
- 17.1 II. Remediation And Cleanup Costs
- 5.1 II. Standing To Assert The Claim
- 13.11 J. Post-Trial Brief
- 11.1 II. Classic Definition Of A Fixture
- 6.5 D. Other Fiduciary Relationships
- 16.3 IV. Contaminated Properties
- Exhibit “2A”
- 21.0 I. Introduction
- 12.0 I. Introduction
- About The Authors
- 3.6
- Table Of Authorities
- 15.4 A. Cunliffe V. County Of Monroe590
- 2.5 VI. Conclusion
- Exhibit “1I”
- 15.6 C. The Albany County Airport Cases599
- 14.0 I. The Nature Of An Appraisal
- 6.6 III. Clearing Title Objections
- 21.3 IV. Special Circumstances