Chapter 7 REASONABLENESS OF THE INSURER'S CONDUCT — THE "FAIRLY DEBATABLE" STANDARD; THE INSURER'S DUTY TO INVESTIGATE; AND OTHER FACTORS APPLICABLE TO THE REASONABLENESS OF AN INSURER'S CONDUCT
Index
- Chapter 7 - CHAPTER 7 REASONABLENESS OF THE INSURER'S CONDUCT — THE "FAIRLY DEBATABLE" STANDARD; THE INSURER'S DUTY TO INVESTIGATE; AND OTHER FACTORS APPLICABLE TO THE REASONABLENESS OF AN INSURER'S CONDUCT
- Chapter 7 - § 7.1 • RECOGNITION OF THE "FAIRLY DEBATABLE" STANDARD IN COLORADO
- Chapter 7 - § 7.2 • APPLICATION OF THE "FAIRLY DEBATABLE" STANDARD IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS
- Chapter 7 - § 7.3 • BAD FAITH CLAIMS IN ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS OR IN CONNECTION WITH CONTRACTUAL APPRAISAL OF LOSS
- Chapter 7 - § 7.4 • BAD FAITH CLAIMS IN DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ACTIONS
- Chapter 7 - § 7.5 • WHETHER A CLAIM IS "FAIRLY DEBATABLE" IS NOT DISPOSITIVE OF THE ISSUE OF COMMON LAW OR STATUTORY BAD FAITH, BUT FAIR DEBATABILITY IS EVIDENCE OF THE REASONABLENESS OF AN INSURER'S CONDUCT
- Chapter 7 - § 7.6 • THE REASONABLENESS OF AN INSURER'S RELIANCE ON EXPERTS
- Chapter 7 - § 7.7 • INSURER'S DUTY TO INVESTIGATE — WHAT CONSTITUTES A "REASONABLE INVESTIGATION"
- Chapter 7 - § 7.8 • A VALUATION DISPUTE, WITHOUT MORE, MAY BE INSUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT A CLAIM FOR UNREASONABLE DENIAL OF BENEFITS
- Chapter 7 - § 7.9 • CONCLUSION — THE MEANING OF THE "FAIRLY DEBATABLE" STANDARD