No. 34, 2000
Index
- Foreword - Creighton Law Review
- A Judge's Perspective
- Avoiding a Will Contest - the Impossible Dream?
- Low-income Housing and the Charitable Exemption
- More Than Learning to Think Like a Lawyer: the Empirical Research on Legal Education
- Teaching First-year Civil Procedure and Other Introductory Courses by the Problem Method
- Notice to Parents: You Cannot Excuse Your Voluntary Actions. in in Re Interest of Dustin H., the Supreme Court of Nebraska Finds No Excuse for Abandonment in a No-visitation Order
- The Admissibility of the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (hgn) Field Sobriety Test and Lay Opinion Testimony in State v. Baue Introduction
- Survey of Eighth Circuit Employment Decisions
- Unwanted Speech and the State's Interest in Protecting Religious Free Exercise: Drawing First Amendment Lines in Olmer v. City of Lincoln
- Baker v. General Motors: the Work Product Doctrine in the Eighth Circuit
- Lochner's Cousin: Demonstrating Originalism's Failure and Its Disingenuous Nature
- Stenberg v. Carhart: Poor Interpretivist Analysis, Unreliable Expert Testimony, and the Immorality of the Court's Invalidation of Partial-birth Abortion Legislation
- Hand-up or Handout? the Americans With Disabilities Act and Unreasonable Ccommodation of Learning Disabled Bar Applicants: Toward a New Paradigm
- United States v. Morrison, the Commerce Clause and the Substantial Effects Test: No Substantial Limit on Federal Power
- Christensen v. Harris County: When Rejecting Chevron Deference, the Supreme Court Correctly Clarified an Unclear Issue
- Congress' Right to Remain Silent in Dickerson v. United States - or - How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Miranda v. Arizona
- Foreword - Creighton Law Review
- The Legitimization of Fetal Tissue Transplantation Research Under Roe v. Wade
- Religious Identity and the Health Care Market: Mergers and Acquisitions Involving Religiously Affiliated Providers
- Genetic Privacy: New Intrusion a New Tort?
- Assessing the Identity of a Claim: the Preclusive Effect of a Prior Challenge to an Administrative Agency's Statutory Interpretation on Subsequent Tax Litigation in Pittston Co. v. United States
- Quality v. Quantity: Will Erisa Preemption Survive the Third Circuit Test of in Re U.s. Healthcare?
- Sssmokinnn': the Supreme Court Burns the Fda's Authority to Regulate Tobacco in Fda v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp