Why the Istook religion amendment should be rejected.
Church & State › Vol. 50 Nbr. 5, May 1997
Linked as:
Church & State › Vol. 50 Nbr. 5, May 1997
Linked as:Summary
The proposed constitutional amendment by Ernest J. Istook (R-OK) claims to be a measure to introduce government-approved religious worship but will actually promote religious tyranny. An examination of the bill indicates that it seeks to remove the principal of church and state which has been good for the country for 206 years. The bill seeks to allow coercive programs of group prayer in public schools, where students already have the right to voluntarily pray at any time during the school day so long as it is not disruptive.
See the full content of this document
Extract
Why the Istook religion amendment should be rejected.
Church-state separationists say U.S. Rep.
Ernest J. Istook's so-called "Religious Freedom Amendment" is a blueprint for government-sanctioned worship, taxation for religion and majoritarian oppression. Here are some points to keep in mind when considering the me...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Singer Sells Out Casino | americans claim cup | Turning the Page On a Long History; St. John's Lutheran has Ministered Since 1854 | n. korea reportedly ready for missile test | Sentencia nº 144 de Consiglio di Stato May 04 2010 | sentencia nº 6617 de consiglio di stato, december 17, 2007 | Sentencia nº 5966 de Consiglio di Stato, November 11, 2008 | Sentencia nº 6607 de Consiglio di Stato December 15 2008