No Waiver From Urgent Forays to Ny Court
Dispute Resolution Journal › Vol. 62 Nbr. 4, November 2007
Linked as:
Dispute Resolution Journal › Vol. 62 Nbr. 4, November 2007
Linked as:Summary
The New York Court of Appeals ruled that a party does not waive the right to arbitrate by applying to the court for urgently needed relief. In Linda A. Stark v. Molod Spitz & DeSantis & Stark (No. 114, Oct 16, 2007), an employment termination dispute, Stark, a contract partner, filed a motion to show cause for extraordinary relief to allow her to continue to represent clients in pending cases. The court found it "notable" that all the firm's motions in the trial court were contemplated by a "so-ordered" stipulation, and thus grew out of Stark's request for emergency relief so she could represent her clients.
See the full content of this document
Extract
No Waiver From Urgent Forays to Ny Court
The New York Court of Appeals ruled that a party does not waive the right to arbitrate by applying to the court for urgently needed relief.
In Linda...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Rutgers Comeback No Shock to Schiano | Leonia Officials Deny Abusing Power Say Indictment Is Based On Politics | determining market perceptions on contamination of residential property buyers using contingent valuation surveys | reafirma alcalde de pharr respaldo a nueva administración municipal de reynosa | decisión de juzgado superior tercero en lo civil y contencioso administrativo de caracas de sept... | Decisión de Juzgado Superior Noveno en lo Civil, Mercantil y del Transito de Caracas, de Aug... | Decisión de Juzgado Segundo De Primera Instancia De Juicio Del Trabajo de Caracas, de August 10, 2007 | Decisión de Tribunal Segundo de Juicio L.O.P.N.A de Caracas de July 17 2007