Study of Final-Offer Arbitration
Dispute Resolution Journal › Vol. 63 Nbr. 4, November 2008
Linked as:
Dispute Resolution Journal › Vol. 63 Nbr. 4, November 2008
Linked as:Summary
A study by two University of Arkansas professors demonstrates that when the parties' proposals are made known to the adversary during the course of final-offer arbitration, the parties end up spending less money to resolve their dispute. The purpose of the study was to determine whether structuring final-offer arbitration in different ways would have an effect on the efficiency and cost of the process. The study examined final-offer arbitration in four scenarios, each one structured in a different way. The authors found that the parties submitted more reasonable offers when they knew that their proposals would be disclosed to each other. When this was not the case, the parties' proposals were more extreme or aggressive.
See the full content of this document
Extract
Study of Final-Offer Arbitration
A study by two University of Arkansas professors demonstrates that when the parties' proposals are made known to the adversary during the cours...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Cwa s Annual Conference Offers a Packed Program On Linking Media and People | Fennimore; Swtc Plans to Upgrade Facilities | Senate Rejects Tax-Cut Limitations Democrats and Moderate Republicans Tried to Make It More Difficult to Approve Future Tax Cuts | Saddam Reportedly Underwent Operation Hernia Surgery Took Place About 10 Days Ago | sentenza nº 6304 de consiglio di stato october 14 2009 | Sentencia nº 697 de Consiglio di Stato February 10 2010 | sentencia nº 5387 de consiglio di stato, october 07, 2008 | Sentencia nº 773 de Consiglio di Stato February 13 2008