Pop quiz: why is fundamental error like pornography?
Florida Bar Journal › Vol. 76 Nbr. 10, November 2002
Linked as:
Florida Bar Journal › Vol. 76 Nbr. 10, November 2002
Linked as:Summary
Appellate Practice and Advocacy
See the full content of this document
Extract
Pop quiz: why is fundamental error like pornography?
Answer: To paraphrase Justice Stewart's often quoted standard, because a court knows it when it sees it. (1)
The doctrine of "fundamental" or "plain" error, which permits appellate review of error without a proper preservation of the issue in the lower tribunal, has been defined consistently in Florida jurisprudence as "error which goes to the foundation of the case or goes to the merits of the cause of action." (2) Additionally, fundamental error has been deemed to "extinguish a party's right to a fair trial." (3) But just as the definition of "obscenity" as material appealing to the "prurient interest" of the average person and "utterly without redeeming social importance" has been-imperfect in its application, (4) the definition of "fundamental error" has been difficult to apply in specific cases, especially in civil actions, and has sometimes resulted in apparent disparate dispositions. (5) The paramount consideration in applying the doctrine of fundamental error should focus on the public's perception and confidence in the judicial process. As Judge Chris W. Altenbernd observed in Hagan v. Sun Bank of Mid-Florida, N.A., 666 So. 2d 580 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996): Although fundamental error is extraordinarily difficult to define, the doctrine functions to preserve the public's confidence in the judicial system. Relief is granted for a fundamental error not because the party has preserved a right to relief from a harmful error, but because the public's confidence in our system of justice would be seriously weakened if the courts failed to give relief as a matter of grace for certain, very limited and serious mistakes. Id. at 584. How, then, is an appellate practitioner, staring at a record or transcript, supposed to know whether the unpreserved error glaring back ...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Convicted Ex-Governor to Be Freed for Appeal Claims Prosecution Was Purely Political | A Luxe Life at Hostels | french rebuke sharon call anti-semitism words irresponsible | mate should tell mother to drop ex talk | Decisión de Juzgado Sexto de los Municipios Valencia, Libertador, Los Guayos, Naguanagua y San Diego de Carabobo, de October 29, 2004 | Decisión de Juzgado Vigesimo de Municipio de Caracas de November 16 2010 | Decisión de Tribunal Tercero de Primera Instancia en Funciones de Control de Lara (Extensión Barquisimeto), de October 22, 2008 | Decisión nº S-N de Juzgado Primero de Primera Instancia en lo Penal en Funciones de Control del L.O.P.N.A de Lara Extensión Barquisimeto de April 24 2008