Defense, Plaintiffs' Attorneys Spar Over Retaliation Ruling by U.S. Supreme Court
Lawyers USA › February 01, 2009
Linked as:
Lawyers USA › February 01, 2009
Linked as:Summary
The recent U.S. Supreme Court decision permitting a worker who was fired after answering questions during an internal sex harassment inquiry to pursue a Title VII claim has the defense and plaintiffs' bars divided over its impact.
While some employment attorneys say the ruling will protect workers from being penalized for speaking out, others say it could hurt employers' efforts to stop workplace bias and harassment by making them hesitant to question employees.See the full content of this document
Extract
Defense, Plaintiffs' Attorneys Spar Over Retaliation Ruling by U.S. Supreme Court
"Employers won't do very broad [harassment] investigations if they fear that an adverse employment action against someone later will lead to a lawsuit," said Louis P. Britt, a partner in the Memphis office of Ford & Harrison who represents employers in labor and employmen...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
grant and cooperative agreement awards columbia hospital for women medical center, | Standard instrument approach procedures, | Marine mammal and endangered and threatened species permit applications, determinations, etc., | Jones Et Al v Lamon Et Al. 206 Ga App 842 426 S.E.2d 657 1992 | Sentencia nº 1137 de Consiglio di Stato March 10 2010 | Gustav Klimt, el pintor rupturista que cada día se torna más popular | Sentencia nº 773 de Consiglio di Stato February 18 2011 | Sentencia nº 1051 de Consiglio di Stato, February 26, 2008