Mediation as malpractice? The effect of California mediation confidentiality statutes.
Defense Counsel Journal › Vol. 79 Nbr. 1, January 2012
Linked as:
Defense Counsel Journal › Vol. 79 Nbr. 1, January 2012
Linked as:Extract
Mediation as malpractice? The effect of California mediation confidentiality statutes.
This article originally appeared in the November 2011 Professional Liability Committee Newsletter.
In January of this year, the California Supreme Court reaffirmed more than a decade of jurisprudence that provides nearly impenetrable confidentiality for communications made pursuant to mediation--even where such communications are offered as evidence of legal malpractice. (1) The court in Cassel v. Superior Court relied on a line of cases stemming from Foxgate Homeowners' Association v. Bramalea California. (2) Despite pleas from statutorily hamstrung Courts of Appeal in the intervening years between Foxgate and Cassel, the Cali...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
d.c laser system will warn pilots | Nba Roundup Miller Delivers in Crunch Time to Lift Pacers | raymond e. redmon | obesity drives rising u.s. hypertension rates | Sentencia nº 2066 de Consiglio di Stato April 17 2009 | Sentencia nº 1950 de Consiglio di Stato, April 17, 2009 | sentencia nº 69 de consiglio di stato january 11 2008 | Sentencia nº 4825 de Consiglio di Stato September 30 2009