New Jersey Appellate Division: No Immunity for Father's Negligence
Lawyers USA › February 06, 2009
Linked as:
Lawyers USA › February 06, 2009
Linked as:Summary
A father is not entitled to immunity in a negligence suit against him for failing to remove his son from a burning car, the New Jersey Appellate Division has ruled in reversing a summary judgment.
The father was driving with his four year-old son strapped in a safety seat directly behind the driver's seat. He told police that when he first noticed smoke, he pulled over to inspect the car, leaving his son in the back. The car caught fire, killing the child. The father escaped but had severe burns and spent weeks in a coma.See the full content of this document
Extract
New Jersey Appellate Division: No Immunity for Father's Negligence
The child's mother sued him for negligence.
A trial cou...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
hudson v. moonier, 304 u.s. 397 (per curiam) (1938) | 49 CFR 624.7 Certification. | 7 CFR 905.10 - Carton or standard packed carton. | 7 CFR 58.807 General construction repair and installation. | Decisión nº 423-2011 de Juzgado Superior Contencioso Tributario de la Región los Andes de Tachira de December 08 2011 | sentencia nº 3633 de consiglio di stato june 15 2011 | sentencia nº 1245 de consiglio di stato, march 16, 2011 | luis jiménez es un émulo de carlos café martínez