Constructive Discharge of Sex Harassment Plaintiff Is a 'Tangible Job Action'

Lawyers USAMarch 27, 2006

Linked as:

Summary


A Title VII plaintiff who claimed she was constructively discharged by her employer as a result of her supervisor's sexual harassment can allege she was subjected to a tangible employment action, the 7th Circuit has ruled in reversing a summary judgment.

The U.S. Supreme Court recently agreed to review a 3rd Circuit case holding the same way.

See the full content of this document

Extract


Constructive Discharge of Sex Harassment Plaintiff Is a 'Tangible Job Action'

Chicago employment attorney Paul Mollica said the issue has been percolating ever since Ellerth and Faragher - a pair of 1998 Supreme Court rulings that helped define supervisor liability in Title VII cases. (Burlington Industries Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742; Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775.)

The issue is pivotal because a plaintiff can establish strict liability and deprive an employer of an affirmative defense if she can show that t...

See the full content of this document

Sponsored links




ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United States

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company