9th Circuit Rules Cellular Telephone Company Can Arbitrate Claims Under Communications Act
Lawyers USA › October 11, 2007
Linked as:
Lawyers USA › October 11, 2007
Linked as:Summary
A cellular telephone company may enforce an arbitration clause in its customer service agreement after it was sued for improper billing in violation of the Federal Communications Act, the 9th Circuit has ruled.
The plaintiff filed a class action against AT&T Wireless, alleging that the company violated the Act by employing "out-of- cycle" billing for its cellular services. According to the plaintiff, AT&T customers incurred improper charges because of the company's practice of billing for cellular calls during a billing period other than the period in which the calls were made.See the full content of this document
Extract
9th Circuit Rules Cellular Telephone Company Can Arbitrate Claims Under Communications Act
The company moved to compel arbitration pursuant to a standard clause in its cu...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
robert lee valentine v. david c. brown, (8th cir. 2002) | miranda b. hannah c. jamie g. jong k. joanne k. james r. james r. george p. anthony g. juan s. leonard p. individually and on beh... | USA vs Berry 5th Cir 2002 | Legislative redistricting | sentencia nº 13982, de corte de apelaciones de valparaiso - sala cuarta, march 12, 2012 | Sentencia nº 770 de Consiglio di Stato February 12 2009 | Sentencia nº 116 de Consiglio di Stato, January 13, 2010 | Sentencia nº 357 de Consiglio di Stato October 18 2010