IRS attacks vacation pay deduction acceleration.
The Tax Adviser › Vol. 26 Nbr. 3, March 1995
Linked as:
The Tax Adviser › Vol. 26 Nbr. 3, March 1995
Linked as:Summary
The IRS position that employer deductions of accrued but not paid vacation pay may not be taken until the tax year when the employee actually receives the pay is based on a poor reading of the legislative history of IRC section 404(a)(5). Accelerating vacation pay deductions had been a widely accepted practice among accrual basis taxpayers. The misinterpretation revolves around the way the legislative history distinguishes between deferred vacation pay and other forms of deferred compensation. The IRS failed to establish whether the deferred compensation rules should even apply.
See the full content of this document
Extract
IRS attacks vacation pay deduction acceleration.
In Letter Ruling (TAM) 9443006, the IRS National Office ruled against a widely used method of accelerating deductions of vacation pay accrued at the end of a tax year but not received by employees until they take their vacations during the following year. This position will presumably be followed by IRS agents in the field, which will probably lead to many audit challenges to similar arrangements. The argument underlying this ruling is extremely weak, however. It is based on an out-of-context reading of the applicable Code provision's legislative history that is unlikely to pers...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
LenderLive Network Provides FHA Training to Meet Growing Demand. | novo construction names directors of its life science division. | ABMC Launches New Innovative Test System for the Rapid Detection of Drugs of Abuse in Oral Fluids. | Caledonia Energy Nears Construction Phase on a New Natural Gas Storage Reservoir in Mississippi, an Advisory from Industrialinfo.... | Decisión nº SME2-0301 de Tribunal Segundo de Primera Instancia de Sustanciación, Mediación y Ejecución del Nuevo Régimen y Régimen Procesal Transitorio del T... | Decisión nº 6C-18672-03 de Tribunal Sexto de Control Los Teques de Miranda, de February 15, 2005 | Decisión nº 8028-04 de Tribunal Primero de Control Extensión Barlovento de Mirand... | decisión nº wp01-s-2004-019868 de juzgado segundo de control de vargas, de oc...