Vol. 45 No. 4, July 2011
Index
- Fortune 1000 firms prefer private cloud.
- Vermont overhauls public records law.
- Cloud providers aren't much concerned with security.
- Judge: D.C. discovery violation 'flagrant'.
- Swiss court: Google must blur street view images.
- Apple's data collection practices scrutinized.
- E-mail still growing.
- ISPs fight France's data retention law.
- U.S. agencies to spend $2.5 billion on cloud storage.
- HHS report finds holes in EHR security.
- Q: What is e-mail archiving?
- Cloud storage providers close up shop.
- New Mexico agencies required to provide e-records.
- Q: When you archive, aren't you just saving everything?
- 2010 data breaches quintupled, but less data stolen.
- Q: What is the difference between records management and retention?
- Data breach puts 3.5 million Texans at risk.
- Yahoo will retain data for 18 months.
- Agencies sued for withholding complaints.
- India restricts free speech online.
- Massive breach exposes millions of e-mails.
- Retention must justify privacy invasion.
- Mexico won't enforce data protection law until 2012.
- Sealed records exposed on PACER.
- Piloting through the records storm: as organizations become more dependent on their information resources and the technologies that create them, such as collaborative work spaces, social media, and mobile devices, information professionals are facing new challenges--and opportunities.
- 5 steps for merging RIM programs: when organizations merge, records and information management (RIM) professionals have a prime opportunity to demonstrate their value by ensuring that information assets are identified, protected, and successfully integrated into a RIM program designed to best serve the newly created entity.
- Picture this: playing a strategic role in your organization: expanding your IT knowledge, using GARP[R] tools to assess your program, and communicating the results and action plan to senior management will help them picture you and your program as strategically important to your organization's success.
- Calling 9-1-1: avoiding disaster using GARP[R]: examining an Ohio Supreme Court case involving a public agency being sued for violation of state recordkeeping requirements provides valuable lessons about how adhering to the Generally Accepted Recordkeeping Principles[R] of Compliance and Availability can help other organizations avoid the expense of this type of litigation.
- Making the case for: merging document control and records management: Part 2.
- The ethical concerns for archivists in an era of change.